Copyright Objection
Filing a reply to a copyright objection involves formally addressing the legal and factual discrepancies raised by the Copyright Office. FileMyFirm offers an exclusive service for its clients to professionally draft and file this reply, ensuring a timely and legally sound response.
Resolve copyright objections quickly.
Professional objection submission.
100% online, secure handling.
Two Expert Consultation Calls FREE Claim TODAY and get free Quotation
Grounds for a Copyright Objection
A copyright objection can be raised by the Registrar of Copyrights based on discrepancies found during the examination of the application or as a result of a third-party complaint. Common reasons include:
- Lack of Originality: The most frequent objection is that the work is not original, as it is a direct copy or too similar to an existing work already in the public domain. Copyright law protects the expression of an idea, not the idea itself.
- Application Inconsistencies: The application may have errors, missing information, or be improperly formatted.
- Discrepancy with Existing Records: The work might be similar to a previously filed or registered copyright application.
- Rights Disputes: An objection may be filed by a third party claiming prior ownership of the work or a part of it.
How to File an Effective Reply
The applicant has a 30-day window to respond to the objection notice. Failure to reply within this period can lead to the application being marked as “rejected.” While there’s no fixed format for the reply, it must be a legal document drafted with care.
- Analyze the Objection Notice: Carefully read the official notice to understand the precise reasons for the objection. This is the most crucial step as it dictates the entire response.
- Draft a Detailed Response: Prepare a point-by-point reply that directly addresses each objection.
- For originality objections: Provide a detailed explanation of the creative process, how the work is unique, and why it is not an imitation. You may need to provide supporting evidence like original drafts, notes, or timestamps of creation.
- For procedural errors: Correct the inconsistencies, provide the missing information, and resubmit the relevant documents.
- For third-party objections: Present legal arguments and evidence to refute the claim of the third party.
- Gather Supporting Documents: Collect and submit all relevant evidence to strengthen your claim. This may include:
- A copy of the original copyright application.
- The discrepancy letter issued by the Registrar.
- Proof of authorship and creation date (e.g., original drafts, emails, sketches, or software code).
- An affidavit, if required, to legally affirm the statements in your reply.
- A Power of Attorney if a legal professional is filing the reply on your behalf.
- Submit the Reply: The reply, along with all supporting documents, must be submitted to the Copyright Office within the specified timeframe.
What Happens After the Reply is Filed?
After submitting the reply, the examiner will review your response.
- Acceptance: If the examiner is satisfied with the reply, the objection is cleared, and the copyright is registered. A registration certificate is then issued.
- Hearing: If the reply is deemed insufficient, the Registrar may schedule a hearing, giving the applicant a final opportunity to present their case in person or through a representative. The Registrar’s decision after the hearing is final.
Frequestly asked questions ( FAQ )
A Copyright Objection is an official challenge against a pending copyright application. It can be raised in two ways:
By the Registrar of Copyrights based on legal or procedural discrepancies found during the examination of the application (Office Objection).
By a third party (such as a previous owner or someone claiming prior rights) who files a formal complaint during the mandatory 30-day waiting period.
Common objections are usually related to the fundamental requirements of copyright law:
Lack of Originality: The work is deemed to be a direct copy, substantially similar to, or not significantly distinguishable from existing works in the public domain.
Application Inconsistencies: The application contains errors, missing essential information, or is improperly formatted (procedural errors).
Rights Disputes: An objection is filed by a third party claiming prior ownership or rights over the work or a part of it.
Similarity to Existing Records: The work is found to be similar to works already registered or previously filed.
The applicant has a strict 30-day window (from the date the objection notice is issued) to formally respond to the objection. Failure to submit a timely and complete reply can lead to the Copyright Office marking the application as “rejected” or “abandoned.”
An effective reply must be a legally sound and detailed document that addresses each objection point-by-point. It should include:
Legal Arguments: Clear explanations and legal reasoning for why the objection is invalid, especially concerning originality.
Supporting Evidence: Documentation to prove the work’s uniqueness and date of creation (e.g., original drafts, software code, design notes, or timestamps).
Corrections: If the objection is procedural, the reply must include the corrected information or missing documents (like a complete Power of Attorney or updated application details).
A hearing is scheduled by the Registrar if they are not satisfied with the applicant’s initial written reply. It provides the applicant (or their legal representative) with a final opportunity to present their case, offer clarifications, and persuade the Registrar to accept the application before a final decision is made on granting or refusing the copyright registration.
The process concludes with one of two outcomes:
Acceptance and Registration: If the Registrar is satisfied that all objections have been successfully addressed and the work meets the legal criteria, the objection is cleared, and the copyright registration certificate is issued.
Refusal: If the Registrar remains unconvinced, they will issue a final refusal order, rejecting the copyright application.